Participles
| Present | pelnants |
| Past | poltos |
Verbal nouns
| tu-derivative | poltus |
| s-derivative | pelnazi |
Active
Indicative Present
| 1st sing. | pelnō |
| 2nd sing. | pelnas |
| 3rd sing. | pelnat |
| 1st plur. | pelnamos |
| 2nd plur. | pelnates |
| 3rd plur. | pelnent |
Subjunctive Present
| 1st sing. | pelnām |
| 2nd sing. | pelnās |
| 3rd sing. | pelnād |
| 1st plur. | pelnāmos |
| 2nd plur. | pelnātes |
| 3rd plur. | pelnānd |
Indicative Perfect
| 1st sing. | pepolai |
| 2nd sing. | pepolistai? |
| 3rd sing. | pepolei |
| 1st plur. | pepolme? |
| 2nd plur. | pepole |
| 3rd plur. | pepolēri |
Imperative Present
Passive
Indicative Present
| 1st sing. | pelnōr |
| 2nd sing. | pelnazo |
| 3rd sing. | pelnator |
| 1st plur. | pelnamor |
| 3rd plur. | pelnentor |
Subjunctive Present
| 1st sing. | pelnār |
| 2nd sing. | pelnāzo |
| 3rd sing. | pelnātor |
| 1st plur. | pelnāmor |
| 3rd plur. | pelnāntor |
Imperative Present
Etymology
Perhaps from Proto-Indo-European *pl̥-né-h₂-ti ~ *pl̥-n-h₂-énti, from *pelh₂- (“to approach”) + *-né-. However, the term cannot be the regular outcome of such a pre-form, the full-grade of which should have yielded **polnā-, and the zero-grade should have produced **plān(a)-. The full-grade might have been analogically introduced from the root aorist. Moreover, the connection with *pelh₂- poses semantic problems. De Vaan, however, suggests that the original sense of "to approach" is likely the source of the compounds in -pellāre (e.g. appellō), some of which mean "to speak to, address". Alternatively, it has been posited that the Latin term reflects an earlier thematic present *péld-e-ti, from a root *peld-, whence also perhaps Old High German falcit and Old English onfilti. However, according to De Vaan, the Umbrian forms confirm an original nasal-present.
Verbs referencing "pelnō"
Latin
pello.
Cognates
-