Participles
| Present | monēnts |
| Past | monatos |
Verbal nouns
| tu-derivative | monatum |
| s-derivative | monēzi |
Active
Indicative Present
| 1st sing. | monēō |
| 2nd sing. | monēs |
| 3rd sing. | monēt |
| 1st plur. | monēmos |
| 2nd plur. | monētes |
| 3rd plur. | monēnt |
Subjunctive Present
| 1st sing. | monēām |
| 2nd sing. | monēās |
| 3rd sing. | monēād |
| 1st plur. | monēāmos |
| 2nd plur. | monēātes |
| 3rd plur. | monēānd |
Indicative Perfect
Imperative Present
Passive
Indicative Present
| 1st sing. | monēōr |
| 2nd sing. | monēzo |
| 3rd sing. | monētor |
| 1st plur. | monēmor |
| 2nd plur. | monēm(e?)n(ai?) |
| 3rd plur. | monēntor |
Subjunctive Present
| 1st sing. | monēār |
| 2nd sing. | monēāzo |
| 3rd sing. | monēātor |
| 1st plur. | monēāmor |
| 2nd plur. | monēām(e?)n(ai?) |
| 3rd plur. | monēāntor |
Imperative Present
Etymology
Disputed. De Vaan and Rix both suggest that the term derives from *m̥néh₁yeti, which was itself possibly formed from Proto-Indo-European *men- (“to stay”) + *-éh₁yeti. However, Schrijver notes that the expected form from *m̥néh₁yeti would be *menēō, not *monēō. According to Schrijver, the term may have borrowed the /o/ from an otherwise poorly attested Proto-Indo-European perfect form *memon-. Alternatively, Sihler argues that the older pre-form may have been *menēō, which—according to Sihler—may have developed into maneō due to the influence of terms such as habeō.
Cognates
-